Getaroom.com's Phone Rates and Manner Fall Flat

I briefly and unscientifically tested the getaroom.com call center experience and wasn't impressed with its unpublished rates over the phone and its customer-service style.

Hotwire offered much steeper discounts for properties with the same star ratings and city areas in two instances, while getaroom.com's phone rate bested Hotwire's opaque rate by a few bucks in a third test.

That being said, I can see how getaroom.com's value proposition would be attractive to some consumers.

As you may recall, getaroom.com is the brainchild of hotels.com founders Bob Diener and David Litman and, as I reported, their business model has raised eyebrows.

getaroom.com offers published rates on its website and then, for certain properties, advises consumers to "call for lower unpublished rates." Alas, it is a means for properties to off-load distressed inventory without publicizing their discounts and diluting their brands.

However, the website pitch to phone for lower rates certainly is a tip-off that the brands have a penchant for discounting.

So, I tested the getaroom.com value proposition on three hotels: the 3-star Hotel Rex in the Union Square West section of San Francisco; Swisshotel in the Magnificent Mile area of Chicago; and the Regal Sun in the Lake Buena Vista-downtown area of Orlando.

I compared:

-- getaroom.com's published website rates;

-- getaroom.com's unpublished phone rates;

-- hotels.com's published rates;

-- and Hotwire's unpublished rates.

For the Hotel Rex in San Francisco, getaroom.com's website published rate for an Aug. 4-6 stay was $160.50 per night, the same as the hotels.com published rate. getaroom.com's unpublished rate over the phone was $146.40, but Hotwire offered an unpublished rate of $113.00 from one of its unidentified hotel partners in the same section of the city.

Incidentally, while getaroom.com listed the Hotel Rex as a 3-star property, hotels.com, Expedia.com and Priceline.com showed it as a 3.5-star property, so I went with the 3.5-star rating for Hotel Rex to come up with the $113.00 Hotwire rate. Hotwire's 3-star rate was even lower, $79 per night.

But, perhaps this getaroom.com-Hotwire face-off is a tad unfair because it is a bit of an apples to grapefruits comparison.

Here's the difference: I phoned the getaroom.com call center and the agent, Todd, went into a spiel about how getaroom has it all over Hotwire because with Hotwire you don’t know the identity of the hotel before you book.

So, with Hotwire the consumer must place some trust in the company that its hotel ratings are accurate and that you won’t end up in a fleabag property.

Regarding the face-off, I was measuring the getaroom.com unpublished rate for one property versus Hotwire's entire roster of properties with the same star rating in the same section of the city. Obviously, Hotwire would have an advantage of scale.

Hotwire gives you the price up-front, and the system is a bit different with competitor Priceline.com, where you enter a bid and wait to see if your offer is accepted. And, with both Hotwire and Priceline you select the star rating and city area, but learn the hotel's identity only after booking.

I’ve often taken advantage of great unpublished rates on Priceline and Hotwire and feel comfortable with booking on both websites.

But, I believe there is a large subset of consumers who would feel much more comfortable getting a sometimes-smaller discount with getaroom.com over the phone than gambling that Priceline or Hotwire will put them in a suitable room.

Although Priceline and Hotwire usually offer hotels from household-name brands, at least with getaroom.com there is no mystery about which hotel consumers will end up in.

And, I also think that some consumers may be unaware that the unpublished rate they can get over the phone from getaroom.com may be substantially higher than if they booked at Priceline or Hotwire.

I continued my rate-testing for the 4-star Swisshotel in the Magnificent Mile section of Chicago. getaroom.com's published website rate for an Aug. 4-6 stay was $206.10 per night, and the hotels.com published rate was $229. getaroom.com's unpublished rate over the phone was $150.81, but Hotwire offered an unpublished rate for a 4-star property in the Magnificent Mile area of Chicago for $92.00, or about 38.7 percent cheaper than getaroom.com's unpublished rate.

In contrast, getaroom.com's unpublished phone rate of $57.72 per night at the 3.5 star Regal Sun in the Lake Buena Vista-downtown section of Orlando was cheaper than Hotwire's $62 rate for a 3.5-star property in that area on the same dates, Aug. 4-6. hotels.com and getaroom.com's website both displayed the same published rate, $66.60 per night.

So, score two big wins for Hotwire, and one narrow victory for getaroom.com.

I'd also like to make a couple of points about my experience in phoning the getaroom.com call center, which I did twice today. I didn't identify myself as a journalist, and passed myself off as an ordinary consumer looking to book a room.

Hey, I'm sleuthing for you, but I digress.

The first agent I spoke with, Todd, was congenial, but a bit pushy.

And, I understand why.

After all, call center distribution costs are higher for getaroom.com than the online channel, especially if the consumer attempts to engage the call center agent in conversation or wants to do some comparison shopping.

I had informed Todd that I wasn’t sure if I wanted to stay in San Franscisco or take a quick getaway to Orlando instead. So, after quoting me the unpublished rate for Hotel Rex in San Francisco, I said I wanted to find out the unpublished rate for a hotel in Orlando.

"OK, which hotel quickly?" he replied.

So, I felt a bit pressured and certain that the agent, anxious to make a booking and move on to the next customer, wasn’t about to go out of his way to satisfy my deal-hunting desires.

getaroom.com's call center is not a place for comparison-shopping, but a venue for wham-bam-thank-you-mam bookings.

Todd warned me, as did a second agent, Tammy, who likewise had a pleasant manner when I called again later to inquire about Swisshotel in Chicago, that I'd better book now because the rates might not be available if I phoned back in a couple of hours.

Thus, a little more pressure, and not a leisurely shopping experience.

So, I think getaroom.com, with its website and call center propositions, might be an effective way for some properties, particularly smaller ones, to put some heads in beds during slack periods.

But, I think many consumers looking for real "deals" will probably stay online rather than phone and find greener pastures and more substantial discounts elsewhere.

Update: Hotels.com Founders Introduce 'Reverse Opaque Rates' and Point to hotels.com Shortcomings

I wrote a post the other day about how Bob Diener and Dave Litman, the founders of HRN (a.k.a. hotels.com), have launched getaroom.com, and indeed they intend to shake things up.

Diener, who owns getaroom.com 50-50 with Litman, described the site's introduction of "reverse opaque rates" for hotel sales.

getaroom focuses on top destinations so if you enter your travel dates and click on Orlando, for instance, you'll see the Sheraton Vistana Resort at a published rate of $125.38 per night.

However, the reverse opaque model comes into play when you register on the website and phone getaroom's call center, staffed by a third-party company, in Dallas.

Diener said that over the phone you'll be able get an unpublished rate for that hotel and others for 10 percent to 50 percent less than the online published rate.

"Our goal is to bring a lot of vitality back and make booking hotels exciting again," Diener said.

The opaque-over-the-phone channel enables hoteliers to market their inventory at rates that they would rather not disclose online, enabling a four-star hotel, for instance, to compete against a three-star property if it so chooses, Diener said.

And, consumers get the advantage of finding a great deal and knowing up-front which hotel they are booking, unlike with Priceline, where you bid on a particular star category in a certain section of a city but learn the hotel's identity only after booking it.

Diener points out that most companies are trying to push consumers online, whereas getaroom.com is incenting consumers to dial for the best deals and values.

Diener and Litman obviously believe in doing things differently and are employing a strategy similar to one they pushed with HRN back in the day.

This is how one hotel consultant described getaroom.com's strategy.

"The strategy is EXACTLY the same strategy they used to launch HRN way back in the early 1990s," the hotel consultant said. "They focused on a few specific high-demand cities, got a handle on the revenue management/yield opportunities and managed the hell out of the pricing to optimize sales and margin."

"They wound up with a low-tech setup that had better demand/price point info than the hotel chains and leveraged it," the consultant added. "Also, speed is king to Litman -- note the results' screen populates within a second."

Diener did not have much to quibble with when I read him that analysis. He said getaroom.com is focusing on key destinations and offers a limited number of hotels with the best values in each of these markets, and "yes, speed is key," he said.

Commenting on the position of hotels.com under Expedia Inc. today, Deiner said hotels.com is a major player "and still has a great brand name, adding that he and Litman were "much more focused on value" when they ran the show.

hotels.com wants to be "everything to everybody," Diener said. "They have lots of hotels even if some are of low value. Their philosophy is to put on everything everywhere."

Diener said he and Litman decided to jump back into the fray after their five-year noncompete agreements expired because "we love the industry, it's in our DNA."

He said the duo saw a great opportunity because "the economy fell off a cliff last September" and the lodging industry needed a new channel to market its inventory.

"The industry really hasn't moved [in the last five years]," Diener said. "It really has stayed the same."

It is fitting then that getaroom.com has "several million dollars" for marketing and is launching spots on satellite radio and soon it will unveil TV ads, too, all to the tune of the William Tell Overture. getaroom, getaroom, getaroom.com.....

As you may recall, the William Tell Overture was also used as the theme music for the classic Lone Ranger television show.

However, there are no Lone Rangers in this story. Diener and Litman are back at it together -- and they may be driving their new model at a very ambitious pace.